‘Georgia: The militarization of humanitarian action’

A thought provoking write-up by Joel Charny of Relief International:

The United States response to the displacement crisis in Georgia resulting from the conflict with Russia over the status of South Ossetia and Abkhazia is a blatant example of the increasing militarization of humanitarian action. Refugees International has been expressing deep concerns about this trend in Africa, but the Georgia response takes it to a new level.

Humanitarian response is supposed to embody the following principles: humanity (responding where the need is greatest; independence (responding based solely on the vulnerability of the individuals in distress rather than reflecting the priorities of other actors); impartiality (responding without applying political criteria or supporting any particular government or political movement). Describing the U.S. response to the current situation in Georgia as a “humanitarian mission” is therefore a serious distortion. The President and the Secretaries of State and Defense, while insisting on the humanitarian nature of the U.S. response, chose to have the Pentagon lead it, with the Air Force organizing relief flights and joining with the Army in distributing the supplies. While the Air Force in an August 14 press release pays lip service to supporting coordination by the U.S. State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development with Georgian officials, the face of the relief effort is clearly a military one.

Read on via AlertNet…

Advertisements

One response to “‘Georgia: The militarization of humanitarian action’

  1. US military providing humanitarian aid is not a new phenomenom. Myanmar, Afghanistan, Tsunami… It is clear the motives are ulterior.

    The worst effect is (as in the last paragraph of the quoted article): “(it is) threatening the integrity and safety of independent humanitarian organizations as they work in an environment dominated by military forces.”

    It is clear aidworkers are more and more exposed to threats of terrorists, bandits and violent opportunists. The link between the US and aidworkers/aidorganisations has directly contributed to an increased targetting of aidworkers abroad. See the bombing of the UN offices in Algeria and Baghdad, but also many of the attacks on individual aidworkers in Afghanistan, Iraq, Sudan, Somalia…

    The US is not doing the world any favours. But then again, we knew that a long time already.

    Read also the article “UN and US, more than one letter of difference?”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s